Karaali, RabiKeven, Arzu2024-10-042024-10-0420221430-63951617-8106https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2022-0128http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12403/3277The purpose of this article is to evaluate four different gas turbine cogeneration cycles which are basic, absorption cooling, air heating and air fuel heating cogeneration cycles by using the most important six evaluation criteria for different excess air coefficient, different compression rates, and different compressor inlet air temperatures. These six evaluation criteria are electrical heat ratio, exergy efficiency, incremental heat rate, artificial thermal efficiency, fuel energy saving ratio, and specific fuel consumption. It is seen that the air-fuel heating cogeneration cycle is the most efficient among the cycles examined for a certain compressor compression ratio, followed by the air heating, basic, and absorption cooling cycles.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesscogenerationevaluation criteriaexergyArticle32112213710.1515/arh-2022-01282-s2.0-85141078457Q3WOS:000869880600001Q3