Cluster Resistance Training Results Higher Improvements on Sprint, Agility, Strength and Vertical Jump in Professional Volleyball Players

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCin, Merve
dc.contributor.authorÇabuk, Refik
dc.contributor.authorDemirarar, Onur
dc.contributor.authorÖzçaldıran, Bahtiyar
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-04T19:04:12Z
dc.date.available2024-10-04T19:04:12Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentBayburt Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of six-week traditional and cluster resistance training (CRT) on sprint, agility, maximal strength and vertical jump parameters in professional volleyball players. Material and Methods: Twenty-eight professional male volleyball players participated in the present study. Athletes were randomly assigned into two training groups: traditional resistance training (TRT) (n=14) and CRT (n=14) groups. Both training groups performed the resistance trainings during six-week on three nonconsecutive days (Monday, Wednesday and Friday). Subjects underwent countermovement vertical jump, agility t, 10-m, 20-m sprint, one repetition maximal (1RM) back squat (BS), bench press (BP), pull over (PO), military press (MP) and dead lift (DL) tests prior to and after sixweek resistance training program. Results: Both training groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in 1RM, sprint times, vertical jump displacement and agility t-test (p<0.05). As compared with the TRT group, the CRT group demonstrated large significant gains in 1RM BS (CRT: 4.76%±2.34% vs. TRT: 2.21%±1.57%; p=0.002, effect size (ES)=0.51), 1RM PO (CRT: 7.59%±4.57% vs. TRT: 3.96%±3.65%; p=0.004, ES=0.91), 1RM DL (CRT: 4.19%±2.76% vs. TRT: 1.79%±2.92%; p=0.024, ES=0.875) and 1RM BP (CRT: 5.82%±4.58 vs. TRT: 2.66%±3.51; p=0.033, ES=0.31). As compared with the TRT group, the CRT group demonstrated significantly higher gains in 20-m sprint (CRT: 6.48%±4.70% vs. TRT: 1.81%±1.04%; p=0.001, ES=1.93), agility t-test performances (CRT: 11.35%±3.89% vs. TRT: 2.28%±1.85%; p=0.000, ES=0.81) and vertical jump displacement (CRT: 6.21%±0.90% vs. TRT: 2.13%±0.61%; p=0.000, ES=5.45). Conclusion: This study suggests that CRT provides more advantages than TRT for professional volleyball players.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage240en_US
dc.identifier.issn1308-0938
dc.identifier.issn2146-8885
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage234en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid490844en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/490844
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12403/4238
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTürkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleCluster Resistance Training Results Higher Improvements on Sprint, Agility, Strength and Vertical Jump in Professional Volleyball Playersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu