Ruhu'l-Beyan tefsirinde kıraat farklılıklarının manaya etkisi
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2024
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Bayburt Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Bu çalışmada, Bursevî'nin Ruhu'l-Beyan tefsirinde okunuş farklılıklarına değinilen ayetler tespit edilerek bunların manaya yansımaları gösterilmiştir. Ayrıca yazarın okunuşunu verip hangi kıraate ait olduğunu bildirmediği ayetlerin hangi imamlar tarafından farklı okunduğu ilgili kaynaklardan tespit edilerek kayda geçirilmiştir. Bununla birlikte anlam bütünlüğü sağlamak ve farklı okunuşun anlam üzerindeki tesirini tam yansıtabilmek adına, yer yer, ayetlerin siyak ve sibakları da dikkate alınarak değerlendirmeleri yapılmıştır. Aynı şekilde, ilgili ayetteki kıraat faklılığının anlama etkisini yansıtabilmek adına farklı müfessirlerin konu hakkındaki değerlendirmelerine de, ihtiyaç duyuldukça, yer verilmiştir.
In this study, the verses in which reading differences are mentioned in Bursevî's Ruhu'l-Beyan commentary were identified and their reflections on meaning were shown. In addition, the verses that the author gave the reading but did not specify which recitation they belonged to were determined and recorded from relevant sources by which imams read them differently. However, in order to ensure semantic integrity and to fully reflect the effect of different readings on the meaning, the verses have been evaluated, taking into account their siyak and sibak. Likewise, the evaluations of different commentators on the subject are included, when necessary, in order to reflect the understanding effect of the difference in recitation in the relevant verse.
In this study, the verses in which reading differences are mentioned in Bursevî's Ruhu'l-Beyan commentary were identified and their reflections on meaning were shown. In addition, the verses that the author gave the reading but did not specify which recitation they belonged to were determined and recorded from relevant sources by which imams read them differently. However, in order to ensure semantic integrity and to fully reflect the effect of different readings on the meaning, the verses have been evaluated, taking into account their siyak and sibak. Likewise, the evaluations of different commentators on the subject are included, when necessary, in order to reflect the understanding effect of the difference in recitation in the relevant verse.
Açıklama
Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Tefsir Ana Bilim Dalı, Tefsir Bilim Dalı
Anahtar Kelimeler
Din, Religion
