Modal identification and fatigue behavior of Eynel steel arch highway bridge with calibrated models

dc.authoridERGUN, Mustafa/0000-0003-4359-1843
dc.authoridALTUNISIK, Ahmet Can/0000-0002-2638-2903
dc.contributor.authorSunca, Fezayil
dc.contributor.authorErgun, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorAltunisik, Ahmet Can
dc.contributor.authorGunaydin, Murat
dc.contributor.authorOkur, Fatih Yesevi
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-04T18:52:30Z
dc.date.available2024-10-04T18:52:30Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentBayburt Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, modal parameters of the Eynel steel arch highway bridge are identified and the fatigue behavior of the bridge is investigated. Modal parameters were extracted from three ambient vibration tests carried out over the period since the bridge came into service. The bridge became operational in 2009, and experimental measurements were taken in 2010, 2019, and 2021. The Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition (EFDD) method in the frequency domain and the Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI) method in the time domain were used. Modal parameters were compared and any differences found over time in the measurement test results were investigated. Comparison of the results shows that changes in the natural frequencies were very limited and there was no change between the mode shapes. When experimental natural frequencies were compared, the maximum difference between the first and second measurements was calculated as 2.827%. Similarly, the maximum difference between the first and third measurements was 5.587% for the second mode, and around 3% for the other modes. This result is as expected because: (i) the bridge is not subject to heavy vehicle traffic and only connects village roads; (ii) no significant earthquake occurred during this period in the region which might have caused structural damage; (iii) no corrosion was found in the structural system elements as there was no contact with the reservoir water; (iv) no settlement or sliding occurred in the ground and boundary conditions remained unchanged. Moreover, the fatigue behavior of the bridge was investigated using the stress life method and AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. To rationalize the results against the fatigue effects, the verified finite element model was used. From the fatigue analyses, it was concluded that the fatigue life of the bridge was within safe limits.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13349-021-00512-w
dc.identifier.endpage1354en_US
dc.identifier.issn2190-5452
dc.identifier.issn2190-5479
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85112366156en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1337en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-021-00512-w
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12403/3493
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000684492700001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Civil Structural Health Monitoringen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAmbient vibration testen_US
dc.subjectSteel arch bridgeen_US
dc.subjectFatigue behavioren_US
dc.subjectHighway bridgeen_US
dc.subjectModal parametersen_US
dc.titleModal identification and fatigue behavior of Eynel steel arch highway bridge with calibrated modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar