Comparison of Post-Tanzimat Ottoman Law and Turkish Positive Law in terms of Insult
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2021
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Ataturk Univ, Fac Theology
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Legal systems aim to protect a person's reputation as well as their material assets. Due to the place where Islam has positioned human beings, fiqh has also revealed norms that will protect human honor. Based on these norms for centuries in the field of judiciary, the Ottoman Empire began to legislate these norms with the influence of the West. In this context, attacks on human honor were also included in the texts of the law, and the courts were asked to handle the cases within the framework of these laws. In the laws, it is seen that insult crimes are regulated in accordance with the classical Hanafi fiqh. However, in law making, fiqh was used less by time, and Western systematics was taken as a basis in the division of crime. In today's Turkish positive law, it is seen that the crime of insult, which is regulated within the crimes against honor, also follows this systematic and is influenced by the Ottoman positive law. In this study, the crime of insult will be discussed comparatively over the successive Hanafi fiqh, the laws of the Tanzimat period, the old Turkish Penal Code in some subjects and today's Turkish Penal Code laws.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Ottoman Law, Lawmaking, Crimes Against Honor, Insult, Satm
Kaynak
Ilahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi-Journal of Ilahiyat Researches
WoS Q Değeri
N/A
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
Sayı
56
