Comparative analysis of stress distributions and safety factor in tensile test specimens with different notch and hole geometries by finite element method
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2026
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Gümüşhane Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
This study analyzes the effects of different notch and hole geometries (V-Notched, U-Notched, circular hole) on stress concentration in Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5) Titanium alloy tensile specimens to provide optimized design recommendations for aerospace and biomedical applications. Finite element method (ANSYS Workbench) was employed to analyze three geometries under 15000 N static tensile loading. SOLID186 20-node quadratic solid elements were used with optimal mesh (31100 elements) determined through convergence study. Von Mises stress distributions and stress concentration factors (Kt) were calculated and validated against Peterson and Neuber theoretical formulas with average error ±1.5%. Results revealed that V-Notched exhibited highest stress concentration (Kt = 5.78, ?max = 1156 MPa), while circular hole showed lowest (Kt = 2.25, ?max = 454.12 MPa). U-Notched demonstrated intermediate performance (Kt = 2.84, ?max = 995.45 MPa). Increasing notch root radius from 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm achieved 51% reduction in stress concentration factor. Maximum shear stress values were 232.74 MPa, 506.38 MPa, and 640 MPa for circular, U-Notched, and V-Notched respectively, while maximum normal stress values reached 467.06 MPa, 1015.1 MPa, and 1809 MPa. Safety factor analysis showed that circular hole configuration meets aerospace standards (FS = 2.05 > 1.5), while U-Notched (FS = 0.93) and V-Notched (FS = 0.80) fall below minimum safety criteria. U-Notched exhibited highest total displacement (1.210 mm), indicating compliance effects. For aerospace and biomedical applications, circular holes should be preferred over sharp notches (154% stress reduction), and minimum corner radius ?2.0 mm is recommended. The critical finding that geometric optimization provides 2.6× safety improvement without material changes demonstrates the powerful role of design in structural reliability for weight-critical applications.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Solid Mechanics, Katı Mekanik
Kaynak
Gümüşhane University Journal of Science and Technology
Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi
Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
0
Sayı
1
