Comparative analysis of stress distributions and safety factor in tensile test specimens with different notch and hole geometries by finite element method

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz, Sümeyye Erdem
dc.contributor.authorGavgalı, Esma
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-28T12:25:12Z
dc.date.available2026-02-28T12:25:12Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentBayburt Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzes the effects of different notch and hole geometries (V-Notched, U-Notched, circular hole) on stress concentration in Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5) Titanium alloy tensile specimens to provide optimized design recommendations for aerospace and biomedical applications. Finite element method (ANSYS Workbench) was employed to analyze three geometries under 15000 N static tensile loading. SOLID186 20-node quadratic solid elements were used with optimal mesh (31100 elements) determined through convergence study. Von Mises stress distributions and stress concentration factors (Kt) were calculated and validated against Peterson and Neuber theoretical formulas with average error ±1.5%. Results revealed that V-Notched exhibited highest stress concentration (Kt = 5.78, ?max = 1156 MPa), while circular hole showed lowest (Kt = 2.25, ?max = 454.12 MPa). U-Notched demonstrated intermediate performance (Kt = 2.84, ?max = 995.45 MPa). Increasing notch root radius from 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm achieved 51% reduction in stress concentration factor. Maximum shear stress values were 232.74 MPa, 506.38 MPa, and 640 MPa for circular, U-Notched, and V-Notched respectively, while maximum normal stress values reached 467.06 MPa, 1015.1 MPa, and 1809 MPa. Safety factor analysis showed that circular hole configuration meets aerospace standards (FS = 2.05 > 1.5), while U-Notched (FS = 0.93) and V-Notched (FS = 0.80) fall below minimum safety criteria. U-Notched exhibited highest total displacement (1.210 mm), indicating compliance effects. For aerospace and biomedical applications, circular holes should be preferred over sharp notches (154% stress reduction), and minimum corner radius ?2.0 mm is recommended. The critical finding that geometric optimization provides 2.6× safety improvement without material changes demonstrates the powerful role of design in structural reliability for weight-critical applications.
dc.identifier.doi10.17714/gumusfenbil.1799320
dc.identifier.endpage178
dc.identifier.issn2146-538X
dc.identifier.issn2146-538X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage160
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.1799320
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12403/6271
dc.identifier.volume0
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGümüşhane Üniversitesi
dc.relation.ispartofGümüşhane University Journal of Science and Technology
dc.relation.ispartofGümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_DergiPark_20260218
dc.subjectSolid Mechanics
dc.subjectKatı Mekanik
dc.titleComparative analysis of stress distributions and safety factor in tensile test specimens with different notch and hole geometries by finite element method
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Öksüz Yayınlar Koleksiyonu