Municipal solid waste-based district heating and electricity production: A case study
dc.authorid | Anvari-Moghaddam, Amjad/0000-0002-5505-3252 | |
dc.authorid | Abusoglu, Aysegul/0000-0001-6362-2323 | |
dc.contributor.author | Tozlu, Alperen | |
dc.contributor.author | Abusoglu, Aysegul | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozahi, Emrah | |
dc.contributor.author | Anvari-Moghaddam, Amjad | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-04T18:52:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-04T18:52:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.department | Bayburt Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, municipal solid waste (MSW) based electricity production and district heating (DH) potential of Turkey are considered. Three MSW based waste-to-energy (WtE) scenarios is developed: (i) Scenario-I, a DH system integrated into a gas turbine power plant (GTPP), (ii) Scenario-II, a DH system integrated into an organic Rankine cycle (ORC), and (iii) Scenario-III, which is based solely on a DH system. As a result of the thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyzes of these developed scenarios using an existing MSW-based cogeneration facility's actual operating data, the system with the most extended payback period (about 5 years) is found as the GTPP-DH system developed in Scenario-I, which also has the highest investment cost. On the other hand, the system with the shortest payback period (about 2 years) is found as the DH system developed in Scenario-III, which also has the lowest investment cost. Overall exergy efficiencies of the GTTP-DH, ORC-DH, and DH systems are found to be 41.86%, 16.15%, and 31.87%, respectively. When the developed WtE scenarios adapted to the pilot provinces selected from each geographical region of Turkey, it is found that the GTPP system developed in Scenario-I can increase the power generation capacity of MSW plants for each province by about 20%. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Danida Fellowship Centre; Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark [18-M06-AAU] | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | The authors acknowledge the support of the HeatReFlex-Green and Flexible District Heating/Cooling project (www.heatreflex.et.aau.dk) funded by the Danida Fellowship Centre and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark to research in growth and transition countries under the grant no. 18-M06-AAU. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126495 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0959-6526 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1879-1786 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85102612910 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126495 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12403/3510 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 297 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000659113300002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Sci Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Cleaner Production | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Municipal solid waste | en_US |
dc.subject | Power production | en_US |
dc.subject | District heating | en_US |
dc.subject | Thermodynamic | en_US |
dc.subject | Thermoeconomic | en_US |
dc.title | Municipal solid waste-based district heating and electricity production: A case study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |